« March 2005 | Main | May 2005 »

April 24, 2005

Intelligent praxis

Michael McMaster self-published "The praxis equation. Design principles for intelligent organisation." in 1997. online chapters

This text remains one of the best explications of the links between KM, complexity and autopoiesis

Michael, weaves together learnings from Warfield, Holland, Kauffman, Seely Brown, Stacey, Valera, Maturana and other leading thinkers. His approach rests on these important praxis design principles:

Without a starting hypothesis discovering which part of that space of possibility will offer us our greatest rewards is left to chance.

A focus collects energy and kindred spirits, gives meaning and imparts energy to any inquiry

We need only to understand how things work - not why they work.

Understanding increases when we observe based on theory and connect inputs to results


The principle of recombination is to intentionally introduce new elements (ideas, language, distinctions) into the pool of established ideas of the existing systems.

Combining existing elements leads to emergence, variety and complexity

In organizations, our building blocks are distinctions, ideas and language.

Create hypotheses and recognize emergent entities

We seldom have the luxury of trying out a carefully planned series of responses. As a sense of urgency increases, our ability to access general principles becomes increasingly important.

Organisations need to have fall-back (more general) responses to cope with the unexpected. When general responses are being applied often it is time to start new research.

The source of success is often remote from the action that appears to be producing the success.


Track back and assign due credit to earlier building blocks, this is increase resilience and innovation.

Michael McMaster points to many core properties of KM: dialog, listening, periphery, distinctions, the key role of language and identity, the importance of creating forums, core documents, levels, emergence and metaphor.

Find a copy - read it!

April 10, 2005

Community inquiry

One of the strongest KM practices happens when a group or community engages in a joint inquiry.

Sharing thoughts from the past:

This is where knowledge is created & discovered, where boundaries are clarified, where collaboration reaches a peak, where knowledge sharing happens.

Communal inquiry seeks new information:

  • objective -- to collect,      compile, synthesize and apply the BEST information with the LEAST      expenditure of energy and effort.
  • assumes: participants are      self-selected; motivation is intrinsic; learning is secondary to delivery;      some measure of trust is present; and the participants are secure and      independent in their identities.
  • principles: the fastest way      to gather information is to identify and ask experts [specifically      acknowledged experts]; agreement on the ontology and boundaries

.... sometimes the term describes an overall activity and sometimes the term describes the mode [or technique] in which some other activity is being conducted ... An example of inquiry as descriptive of an overall activity: "We are conducting an inquiry into the causes of the latest power outage". An example of inquiry as a technique: "We always work hard to strike a proper balance between advocacy and inquiry during staff meetings".

Craig 10Dec98

Scanning as inquiry: the team must agree on what to look for, develop domain expertise, cultivate relationships, select the best, most cost effective medium and tools, mostly this is either a purchased clipping service, a newsfeed or specific database subscriptions. they need to construct an information needs profile for their customers and determine how they will share general info.... drivers are a little different here as speed and uniqueness are critical.


Inquiry as reflection:

An inquiry may be conducted without any external inputs. In this case the objective is to dredge the individual or corporate memory, discover what is known or available or existing but forgotten. Many of the basic techniques apply here as well. Clear definitions, understandings and clarity on the goals, exploration of all the sources [people, repositories, stories, experiences], selection and evaluation of the material and presentation. An important component of a reflective inquiry is to place the findings in useful context, structure and organize the information in a way that addresses the problem or the original questions.


Perhaps inquiry is the process of deciding what the questions are and how to recogniae the answers. Action then is fact-finding, followed by more inquiry related to the relevance of the facts found, and how to apply them, followed by action to apply the solution. Inquiry is thus very related to coming to an agreement -- within one's own mind, or within a group.

Duncan

11Dec98


.... learning, trust and different perspectives suggest that even when we are engaged in an non-inquiry project, the use of small-scale inquiry technique does serve a larger, longer-term purpose. Namely it is a major contributor to trust building and learning about each other's perspectives. This results in knowledge about how we can work most effectively with each other and thus can improve our collaborative performance going forward.

Craig 11Dec98


Communal search as inquiry:

The power of inquiry coming from the ability of a group to share the information seeking tasks, from their sharing of news and effective monitoring of new developments and from their ability to access new people because of a larger combined access to weak ties in their combined personal networks.

...We need groups ... to be the scouts and scanners and amassers of incredible knowledge wealth who then come back and throw their riches into big piles that other groups can sort and refine and filter with their unique perspectives and the techniques and churn out ever more interesting applications, solutions and also an unending supply of new questions for the scanners and scouts to bring back possible answers for.

Duncan

13Dec98


Where does inquiry leverage come from?

  • access to new ideas?
  • from reflections and dwelling      in the questions?
  • from the dialog and more      questions?
  • from linking your models to      alternative interpretations?

When do you search for new ideas, and when do you reflect, mull, synthesize, categorize, revise, alter old models, incorporate new ideas?

How is that switch best implemented?

·               What are the critical signs that it is time to orchestrate a switch?
· What are the signs that we are stuck in the hollow?
· What is the best way to raise the entropy level?
· When does high entropy become dysfunctional?
 
Coherence -- integration -- entropy -- how are these phenomena really related?

April 03, 2005

Key KM web site

One of the best KM web sites is NeLH - take a look

National Library for Health's (UK) KM web pages

An excellent well-balanced view of KM. The site is comprehensive covering: KM skills, techniques, technologies including a FAQ and glossary.

Most of the work seems to have been done in the 2000 - 2002 timeframe - There are no recent KM books listed, but KM healthcare articles are current.

A companion blog "Talking knowledge management" also helps to keep visitors current.

I was pleased to discover a KIMNET (The ASLIB KM and IM community) link at  NeLH's  site 

Although the NeLH site has a clear healthcare bias, and may favor UK sources, it is well worth a visit.